Cont.…
This is the prosecution of George Chapman.
Below is our affidavit that could convict Chapman as JTR.
Jack the Ripper is George Chapman
Premise 1
Chapman had a tendency to kill women.
Argument
He was convicted from poisoning 3 women in England
Sub argument
Between the year of 1897- 1902, Chapman had poisoned his mistress who often posed as his wife to death but being prosecuted for only one murder case.

Premise 2
Chapman knows human anatomy well
Argument
Chapman had the background of being a surgeon in Poland until December 1888
Sub Argument
Chapman has the capability in handling knives and operates human body which suits the victim’s condition.

Premise 3
Chapman moved to London without any motives/ concrete reason
Argument
The duration between Chapman’s arrival to London and the murders is close to each other
Sub Argument
During that time, Chapman resided near to the place of murders and works as barber in Whitechapel.

Premise 4
Chapman had a regular job as a barber in Whitechapel.
Argument
The murders only occurred in the weekends which mean he has leisure time during the weekends.
Sub Argument
Chapman's wife, Lucy gives a statement that George always staying outside during the weekend.


This is the affidavit of our prosecutors group and we believed that George Chapman is Jack the Ripper. The article of his background will be included. It is now up to you to determine who is Jack The Ripper.

Please be kind and comment, ThankYou

Men vs Women?

Assalamualaikum,
In previous class, we have learned about inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
An inductive reasoning is observing the specific evidence to general conclusion. While deductive is from general conclusion to specific details. What is this theory having anything to do with man vs woman? Okay, generally, we always think that man is an observing human being. While woman, instead are more delicate but is straightforward. 


However, in the class, I learned that men especially are most likely to use deductive reasoning in their daily life rather than inductive reasoning. Why is that so? Well, our lecturer tells us that men are usually straightforward. They do not like to keep things complicated. For them, being direct and simple is the only way they could act. Men often use dysphemism when having conversation with their group.

Different from women they use inductive reasoning because they are a delicate human being that does not speak frankly but use any other words to deliver their true message to people. However, it is a nature for women to be shy and not direct when telling people what they want. People often said that woman is complicated but it is our nature to be soft and use proper word when converse with people. This is because women normally would not want to hurt other people by being too frank. So women tend to use euphemism when talking.

Speaking of this, I think women do not always use inductive reasoning. We can be frank when needed. It is only that men sometimes does not understand how delicate is women’s feelings. That is why they are often an argument happens between men and women. Both use different ways to interact and deliver their message.
Men in other way round are the simplest species. Their simplicity sometimes can lead to argument whether they have feelings or not. They were too direct and they do not understand how women feelings are. That is why; we always misunderstood their real intention. Whether they are joking or being real.
So, men vs women… I think men should be considerate and women should be more open. If this could happen, the world may be in peace forever. J



Please be kind and comment, ThankYou

Who is he?

Assalamualaikum.

Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs. 
Ever wonder who is he? 
He is the founder of the greatest technology of all. What technology? Of course, Apple and PIXAR. See, how great he was. Despite his greatest invention of all, this man, Jeff Goodell, said he was abrasive, unapologetic person and so many ugly sides of Jobs. Who knew he could be such person.

He is cold and abrasive but amazing inside
The article “Steve Jobs Nobody Knew” surely gives a big shock to whoever read it. Steve could be such freaks, demanding, and perfectionist. Well, he sure can be one. Who could ever deny that he was the creator of Apple and PIXAR? No one. So, it is really acceptable for him to be sometimes ‘a pain in the arse’ right?
No matter how Goodell writes about Steve Jobs, he still is one of a kind. Jobs never manage to graduate from college. He is a drop-out. Who could ever imagine he can be as successful as he was, well, the fact that he died is one thing. But, does anyone ever think like him? Well, maybe some, but no one can make it for real. Steve is different, he think, he planned and he did. That’s the real him.
Old doesn't mean to stop inventing

Even if he did wrong to his co-workers, push them to the limit, which is because he wanted them to be like him, passionate about their work. Be a person who can make it work. That was his intention. Steve Jobs, know what he was and he is still the best creator of all no matter what people said about him.

Please be kind and comment, ThankYou